From what I’ve seen so far, this journal gets right the things most commonly written incorrectly elsewhere, including: <\/p>\n
- \n
- word parsing<\/li>\n
- capping of proper nouns<\/a> and the first letter in a sentence<\/li>\n
- apostrophes<\/a><\/li>\n
- proper orthography for the tense-marking particles zhe<\/em> (著\/着), guo<\/em> ( 過\/过)<\/a>, and le<\/em> (了)<\/a> — perhaps the best indicator of careful attention to detail. Note that the example below has lǐjiě le<\/em><\/span> and dìngxiale<\/em><\/span>, both of which are correct in their contexts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
And it doesn’t use the atrocious ɑ that some people mistakenly believe is required<\/a> either. <\/p>\n
Unfortunately, punctuation and alphanumerics are not included in the Pinyin. But other than that there’s very little that doesn’t follow standard Pinyin orthography<\/a>, the main exception being the indication of the tone sandhi related to the special cases of yī<\/span> and bù<\/span>, (e.g., the journal gives “bú shì<\/span>” and “búdà<\/span>” instead of the standard “bù shì<\/span>” and “bùdà<\/span>,” and “yìhuíshì<\/span>” and “yí wèi<\/span>” instead of the standard “yīhuíshì<\/span>” and “yī wèi<\/span>“). That said, though, tone changes related to yi<\/em> and bu<\/em> can<\/em> be something of a pain. So although this isn’t standard, I can see why it was done and am not entirely unsympathetic to this approach. <\/p>\n
Here are a few sample lines (click to enlarge):
\n![\"screenshot](\"https:\/\/pinyin.info\/news\/news_photos\/2011\/03\/watchtower_small.gif\" "\\"click")
<\/a><\/p>\nIt would be nice if this were in Unicode, to help aid searches and cutting and pasting. The text, however, appears to have been made in a system devised years ago by the people at the journal. Regardless, I’m happy to see the Pinyin. <\/p>\n
Overall, despite the lamentable absence of punctuation and Arabic numerals in the Pinyin, this is quality work, which is perhaps all the more remarkable in that the Pinyin and simplified Hanzi edition of this journal is not truly free to circulate in the land of its target audience. That’s because its publishers are Jehovah’s Witnesses, a group suppressed by the PRC (though it appears that at least at the moment their sites are not blocked by the great firewall). The journal, Shǒuwàngtái<\/em><\/span>, may be more familiar to you by its English name: Watchtower<\/em>. Whatever you might think of Jehovah’s Witnesses, I hope you’ll recognize the considerable accomplishment of those who put together this publication. <\/p>\n
Getting to the Jehovah’s Witnesses Web pages that link to Shǒuwàngtái<\/em> can be tricky. (Go to the magazines page<\/a>, select “Chinese (Simplified)” for the language; then choose the month and file with Pinyin.) So I’m providing direct links to some documents below: <\/p>\n
- \n
- January, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- February, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- March, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- April, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- May, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- June, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a> (compare with part 1 in English<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
I haven’t found any Pinyin editions other than those. Perhaps old ones are taken offline.<\/p>\n
![\"Rénrén](\"https:\/\/pinyin.info\/news\/news_photos\/2011\/03\/watchtower_hao_xiaoxi.gif\" "\\"watchtower_hao_xiaoxi\\"")
<\/p>\nWith thanks to Victor Mair.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Behold, I bring you good tidings. As I keep having to note, most of the things that are supposedly in Pinyin are terrible. This is not because Pinyin itself is inherently poor or difficult. It’s because most people who produce … Continue reading
- February, part 1<\/a>, part 2<\/a><\/li>\n
- apostrophes<\/a><\/li>\n